land ufered
to
ALE
Lander back.
5/ this desp
And it at, //think
regrettably) be hard to take this line
because if
Land an
defence purposes
vally ngmied for
we cannot in the
last usort ufuse to hand them over.
No 31.
Sir,
123
9:19 FFB 12
GOVERNMENT HOUSE,
HONGKONG, 17th. January, 1912.
But there is no nawn
why we saw not
rub it in to Wo. that thy night to
play the game a Ithe contract.
Mr. Stubbs
perform their share Da Kerwrth
$219/3.
M
$4.26.3.12
Remind?
boom. 3/7
stume By &
In connection with an application by the Military Authorities for "clearance rights" over a large area of land adjoining Mount Davis, I have the honour to submit the following observations for your consideration.
2.
My predecessor in his Despatch of 7th. March January, 1905, paragraph 2, stated that the War Department under the "Agreement" effected by Colonel Lewis concede the principle that the grant of lands by the Colonial Government to the Military Authorities as "Military Reserves" e.g. with "clearance rights" - does not convey to the War Department the building value of the land.
3.
It appears to follow as a corollary that if any such Reserve includes a building site, which the Military Authorities desire to reserve free from any building, they should acquire the site as "Military Lands", at its agreed market value, and the cost should be debited to the "Military Lands Account". Having thus acquired exclusive rights over the area in question, it is open to the Military Authorities either to build upon it, or to exclude any building upon it as they may prefer.
4.
Consequent on this it follows that if the
Military Authorities desire to place certain restrictions upon any buildings which may be erected upon a "Military Reserve" by the
RIGHT HONOURABLE
LEVIS HARCOURT, M.P.,
&c.,
&C..
&o...
Colonial
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.